Critiques - Revision history

192.168.23.11: /* Sample agenda */

2023-11-05T02:33:26Z

Sample agenda

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 5 November 2023
Line 162:		Line 162:
	**: leading questions: How were teams briefed? Were they provided sufficient background information? Did they understand their assignment and operating procedures? Were teams efficiently debriefed? Did all the information that was needed get recorded?		**: leading questions: How were teams briefed? Were they provided sufficient background information? Did they understand their assignment and operating procedures? Were teams efficiently debriefed? Did all the information that was needed get recorded?
	** searching		** searching
-	**: leading questions: What was the initial strategy for response to this emergency? What techniques proved effective? How did the stategy evolve and change during the emergency and how were ~~thes~~ changes implemented? What problems did ~~seachers~~ encounter? What improvements could be made in searching?	+	**: leading questions: What was the initial strategy for response to this emergency? What techniques proved effective? How did the stategy evolve and change during the emergency and how were these changes implemented? What problems did searchers encounter? What improvements could be made in searching?
	** access/return from segment		** access/return from segment
	**: leading questions: How was access to/from the search segments?		**: leading questions: How was access to/from the search segments?

192.168.23.11: /* Sample agenda */

2023-11-05T02:25:24Z

Sample agenda

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 5 November 2023
Line 154:		Line 154:
	**: leading questions: Was the emergency detected promptly? How was it detected? Who called who? Was the magnitude of the emergency assessed correctly at the start? What means were used for this assessment? Are any guides or aids needed to assist emergency evaluation? Was our information adequate?		**: leading questions: Was the emergency detected promptly? How was it detected? Who called who? Was the magnitude of the emergency assessed correctly at the start? What means were used for this assessment? Are any guides or aids needed to assist emergency evaluation? Was our information adequate?
	** call-out		** call-out
-	**: leading questions: When was Callout notified? Was it appropriate to mobilize PCSAR resources and was this promptly initiated? How could the response time improve? Was a search manager notified promptly? Were search personnel notified promptly? Were the appropriate type of personnel requested? Were there people that met the criteria that were not called? Was ~~their~~ an appropriate response? Were contact numbers up to date?	+	**: leading questions: When was Callout notified? Was it appropriate to mobilize PCSAR resources and was this promptly initiated? How could the response time improve? Was a search manager notified promptly? Were search personnel notified promptly? Were the appropriate type of personnel requested? Were there people that met the criteria that were not called? Was there an appropriate response? Were contact numbers up to date?
	** investigation		** investigation
	**: leading questions: What investigations were happening beyond the search effort? What information was key to shaping the search? What could be done to obtain trustworthy information in a timely manner?		**: leading questions: What investigations were happening beyond the search effort? What information was key to shaping the search? What could be done to obtain trustworthy information in a timely manner?

Brett Wuth: /* After the critique */

2021-02-16T22:13:46Z

After the critique

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 16 February 2021
Line 199:		Line 199:
	** Assign suggestions to be reviewed by PC SAR board, PC SAR preplan committee, PC SAR equipment committee, PC SAR call out committee, PC SAR training committee or one of our partner organizations.		** Assign suggestions to be reviewed by PC SAR board, PC SAR preplan committee, PC SAR equipment committee, PC SAR call out committee, PC SAR training committee or one of our partner organizations.
	* place the critique suggestions on the wiki under the "Critique" subpage of the [[Incident]].		* place the critique suggestions on the wiki under the "Critique" subpage of the [[Incident]].
-	* Forward your report to each group.	+	* {{subpage\|Email Report\|Forward your report to each group.}}
	* Send the sign-in list from the critique to the Membership Coordinator.		* Send the sign-in list from the critique to the Membership Coordinator.
	* Update this page on the wiki to make it easier and better to run another critique.		* Update this page on the wiki to make it easier and better to run another critique.

Brett Wuth: /* After the critique */

2021-02-16T22:12:28Z

After the critique

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 16 February 2021
Line 198:		Line 198:
	** Sort and write up the suggestions (we have examples of this). See [[PCSAR DOC-97 Critique form\|PCSAR Doc-97]]		** Sort and write up the suggestions (we have examples of this). See [[PCSAR DOC-97 Critique form\|PCSAR Doc-97]]
	** Assign suggestions to be reviewed by PC SAR board, PC SAR preplan committee, PC SAR equipment committee, PC SAR call out committee, PC SAR training committee or one of our partner organizations.		** Assign suggestions to be reviewed by PC SAR board, PC SAR preplan committee, PC SAR equipment committee, PC SAR call out committee, PC SAR training committee or one of our partner organizations.
		+	* place the critique suggestions on the wiki under the "Critique" subpage of the [[Incident]].
	* Forward your report to each group.		* Forward your report to each group.
	* Send the sign-in list from the critique to the Membership Coordinator.		* Send the sign-in list from the critique to the Membership Coordinator.

Brett Wuth: /* Leading up to the critique */

2016-12-01T00:59:41Z

Leading up to the critique

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 1 December 2016
Line 119:		Line 119:
	* Pick a time (Tuesday evening?) when most participants in the search are available.		* Pick a time (Tuesday evening?) when most participants in the search are available.
	* book a room ([[Fire Hall]], [[MD Meeting Room]], [[Town Hall Gym]])		* book a room ([[Fire Hall]], [[MD Meeting Room]], [[Town Hall Gym]])
-	* Announce by e-mail or call-out.	+	* {{subpage\|Announce}} by e-mail or call out.
	* Have someone (usually the last Search Manager involved) draft a 1 page summary of the incident. (see [[Template:Incident Report]])		* Have someone (usually the last Search Manager involved) draft a 1 page summary of the incident. (see [[Template:Incident Report]])
	* Review the Incident Report. If you have questions, check the [[Incidents\|incident files]].		* Review the Incident Report. If you have questions, check the [[Incidents\|incident files]].

Brett Wuth: /* Sample agenda */

2016-09-19T20:52:43Z

Sample agenda

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 19 September 2016
Line 137:		Line 137:
	* introductions		* introductions
	* sign in (to the critique)		* sign in (to the critique)
		+	* note taker
	* confidentiality		* confidentiality
	* brief report from person in charge of post op activities (last search manager?) re expenses, lost and found, work needing doing, etc.		* brief report from person in charge of post op activities (last search manager?) re expenses, lost and found, work needing doing, etc.
Line 145:		Line 146:
	** how suggestions will be distributed		** how suggestions will be distributed
	** committees that will make decisions on suggestions		** committees that will make decisions on suggestions
-	* incident summary (from draft ~~1-page~~ report)	+	* incident summary (from draft report)
	* functional areas of incident (there likely will only be time to cover the most significant)		* functional areas of incident (there likely will only be time to cover the most significant)
	*: The ''leading questions'' are just to help the participants think about the subject matter of the functional area. The chair can read them if the participants are stumped about what to say about a functional area. They don't have to be asked or answered, if the group is already jumping into discussion about the functional area.		*: The ''leading questions'' are just to help the participants think about the subject matter of the functional area. The chair can read them if the participants are stumped about what to say about a functional area. They don't have to be asked or answered, if the group is already jumping into discussion about the functional area.

Brett Wuth: /* Sample agenda */

2016-09-07T19:05:27Z

Sample agenda

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 7 September 2016
Line 187:		Line 187:
	**: leading questions: What were the major post op activities? When was the team fully ready to be deployed again? Was this work left to only a few volunteers?		**: leading questions: What were the major post op activities? When was the team fully ready to be deployed again? Was this work left to only a few volunteers?
	** learning		** learning
-	**: leading questions: How ~~has/~~could ~~the~~ critique ~~support~~ learning? For exercises, how did/could the goals/techniques promote learning?	+	**: leading questions: How could this critique have been made a stronger learning opportunity? For exercises, how did/could the goals/techniques promote learning?
	** miscellaneous		** miscellaneous
	**: leading questions: Are there any subject areas we haven't touched on?		**: leading questions: Are there any subject areas we haven't touched on?

Brett Wuth: /* Sample agenda */

2016-09-07T18:59:55Z

Sample agenda

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 7 September 2016
Line 173:		Line 173:
	**: leading questions: How could this incident have been prevented? Was this incident used to educated the public?		**: leading questions: How could this incident have been prevented? Was this incident used to educated the public?
	** travel		** travel
-	**: leading questions: How did responders get to and from the site? Were convoys used? Was there a need for people to check in when they returned? Was travel safety evaluated?	+	**: leading questions: How did responders get to and from their home/station to the site? Were convoys used? Was there a need for people to check in when they returned? Was travel safety evaluated?
	** Plans Section		** Plans Section
	**: leading questions: What preplans were in place to help with this incident? Were maps, situation reports, weather and hazard forecasts provided to all who needed them? Was the selection of team assignments guided by analysis of the situation? Was the plan for the next op period ready before it started? Were clues, PODs, map updates and recommendations from the field being used to focus search efforts and provide updated information to teams going to the field?		**: leading questions: What preplans were in place to help with this incident? Were maps, situation reports, weather and hazard forecasts provided to all who needed them? Was the selection of team assignments guided by analysis of the situation? Was the plan for the next op period ready before it started? Were clues, PODs, map updates and recommendations from the field being used to focus search efforts and provide updated information to teams going to the field?

Brett Wuth: /* Sample agenda */

2016-09-07T18:58:17Z

Sample agenda

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 7 September 2016
Line 161:		Line 161:
	**: leading questions: How were teams briefed? Were they provided sufficient background information? Did they understand their assignment and operating procedures? Were teams efficiently debriefed? Did all the information that was needed get recorded?		**: leading questions: How were teams briefed? Were they provided sufficient background information? Did they understand their assignment and operating procedures? Were teams efficiently debriefed? Did all the information that was needed get recorded?
	** searching		** searching
-	**: leading questions: What was the initial strategy for response to this emergency? What techniques proved effective How did the stategy evolve and change during the emergency and how were thes changes implemented? What problems did seachers encounter? What improvements could be made in searching?	+	**: leading questions: What was the initial strategy for response to this emergency? What techniques proved effective? How did the stategy evolve and change during the emergency and how were thes changes implemented? What problems did seachers encounter? What improvements could be made in searching?
	** access/return from segment		** access/return from segment
	**: leading questions: How was access to/from the search segments?		**: leading questions: How was access to/from the search segments?

Brett Wuth: /* Leading up to the critique */

2016-09-07T18:52:28Z

Leading up to the critique

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 7 September 2016
Line 122:		Line 122:
	* Have someone (usually the last Search Manager involved) draft a 1 page summary of the incident. (see [[Template:Incident Report]])		* Have someone (usually the last Search Manager involved) draft a 1 page summary of the incident. (see [[Template:Incident Report]])
	* Review the Incident Report. If you have questions, check the [[Incidents\|incident files]].		* Review the Incident Report. If you have questions, check the [[Incidents\|incident files]].
		+	* Decide which are the most important functional areas to discuss.
	* Invite the tasking agency and other organizations we worked with to send a representative. Many SAR groups are listed at: http://www.saralberta.ca		* Invite the tasking agency and other organizations we worked with to send a representative. Many SAR groups are listed at: http://www.saralberta.ca
	* Decide whether snacks are needed and arrange them.		* Decide whether snacks are needed and arrange them.