http://pcsar.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=California_Mugshot_Removal&action=history Revision history for this page on the wiki en MediaWiki 1.12.0 Sat, 18 Apr 2026 04:37:29 GMT http://pcsar.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=California_Mugshot_Removal&diff=70018&oldid=prev <p></p> <table style="background-color: white; color:black;"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">←Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 20:15, 23 March 2022</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>-</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>California has taken a pretty aggressive <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">stand to protect </del>against mugshot removal online websites. The California attorney general Becerra has indicted four <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">people </del>in association with <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">operating </del>Mugshots.com and UnpublishArrests. The charges include money laundering, extortion and identity theft. The California DA <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">defined </del>it as <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a company </del>permeated with fraud, <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">with the </del>[http://removemymugshot.org/<del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">lawyer-for-mugshot-removals </del>site<del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">] </del>owners <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">incorporating </del>businesses in the West Indies, <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">setting up </del>their domain in Belize and hosting their <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">web site </del>in Australia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The four <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">individuals </del>were extradited to California to face their criminal charges. They also face sustained <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">suit </del>in Illinois. The case is pending in the Northern District of Illinois.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California law was <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ratified </del>in August 2015. Senate Bill 1027 took effect on January 1, 2015 and <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> [http://www.hgexperts.com/expert-witness/incept-technologies-llc--167925 site] </del>prohibits <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">web pages </del>from <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">posting </del>arrest photos then asking a fee to take them <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </del>down. It’s against the law to <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">accept payment </del>to correct or <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">update </del>them as well. There are no <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">stipulations </del>on the accessibility to the arrest <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">information </del>by <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">media </del>organizations and <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">still </del>interested individuals. <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Generally </del>There are fines for disobeying the California <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">statutes </del>but <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unfortunately </del>it does <del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">almost </del>nothing to people that wish to reprint the information internet.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>California has taken a pretty aggressive <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">stance </ins>against <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[http://www.hgexperts.com/expert-witness/incept-technologies-llc--167925 </ins>mugshot <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">removal service] </ins>removal online websites. The California attorney general Becerra has indicted four <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">men </ins>in association with <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">running </ins>Mugshots.com and UnpublishArrests. The charges include money laundering, extortion and identity theft. The California DA <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">identified </ins>it as <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">an organization </ins>permeated with fraud, <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </ins>[http://removemymugshot.org/<ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">about Removemymugshot.org] with the </ins>site owners <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">organizing </ins>businesses in the West Indies, <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">registering </ins>their domain in Belize and hosting their <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">website </ins>in Australia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The four <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">men </ins>were extradited to California to face their criminal charges. They also face sustained <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">litigation </ins>in Illinois. The case is pending in the Northern District of Illinois.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California law was <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">enacted </ins>in August 2015. Senate Bill 1027 took effect on January 1, 2015 and prohibits <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">online sites </ins>from <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">putting up </ins>arrest photos then asking a fee to take them <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">all the way </ins>down. It’s against the law to <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">allow money </ins>to correct or <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">modify </ins>them as well. There are no <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">regulations </ins>on the accessibility to the arrest <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">reports </ins>by <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">news </ins>organizations and <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </ins>interested individuals. <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </ins>There are fines for disobeying the California <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">statute </ins>but <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unfortuitously </ins>it does <ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </ins>nothing to people that wish to reprint the information internet.</div></td></tr> </table> Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:15:36 GMT 192.168.23.11 http://pcsar.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php/Talk:California_Mugshot_Removal http://pcsar.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=California_Mugshot_Removal&diff=70017&oldid=prev <p>New page: California has taken a pretty aggressive stand to protect against mugshot removal online websites. The California attorney general Becerra has indicted four people in association with oper...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>California has taken a pretty aggressive stand to protect against mugshot removal online websites. The California attorney general Becerra has indicted four people in association with operating Mugshots.com and UnpublishArrests. The charges include money laundering, extortion and identity theft. The California DA defined it as a company permeated with fraud, with the [http://removemymugshot.org/lawyer-for-mugshot-removals site] owners incorporating businesses in the West Indies, setting up their domain in Belize and hosting their web site in Australia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The four individuals were extradited to California to face their criminal charges. They also face sustained suit in Illinois. The case is pending in the Northern District of Illinois.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California law was ratified in August 2015. Senate Bill 1027 took effect on January 1, 2015 and [http://www.hgexperts.com/expert-witness/incept-technologies-llc--167925 site] prohibits web pages from posting arrest photos then asking a fee to take them down. It’s against the law to accept payment to correct or update them as well. There are no stipulations on the accessibility to the arrest information by media organizations and still interested individuals. Generally There are fines for disobeying the California statutes but unfortunately it does almost nothing to people that wish to reprint the information internet.</div> Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:18:34 GMT 192.168.23.11 http://pcsar.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php/Talk:California_Mugshot_Removal