Search Manager/Search Technique Effectiveness - Revision history

Brett Wuth: /* Search dogs */

Brett Wuth — Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:14:37 GMT

Search dogs

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 5 March 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Search dogs ==		== Search dogs ==

-	A NASAR analysis of the effectiveness of	+	A {{subpage\|2016-02 NASAR dog effectiveness part 1\|NASAR analysis}} of the effectiveness of
	search dog teams. There are no good statistics for SAR so wildlife		search dog teams. There are no good statistics for SAR so wildlife
	detection dogs are used to approximate.		detection dogs are used to approximate.

	{{blockquote\|"wildlife detection dogs operating in the field cover approximately 5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the field."}}		{{blockquote\|"wildlife detection dogs operating in the field cover approximately 5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the field."}}

Brett Wuth: /* Search dogs */

Brett Wuth — Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:11:51 GMT

Search dogs

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 5 March 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	detection dogs are used to approximate.		detection dogs are used to approximate.

-	{{blockquote\|	+	{{blockquote\|"wildlife detection dogs operating in the field cover approximately 5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the field."}}
-	"wildlife detection dogs operating in the field cover approximately	+
-	5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on	+
-	various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were	+
-	found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the field."}}	+

Brett Wuth: /* Search dogs */

Brett Wuth — Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:11:30 GMT

Search dogs

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 5 March 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on		5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on
	various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were		various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were
-	found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the	+	found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the field."}}
-	field."}}	+

Brett Wuth: /* Search dogs */

Brett Wuth — Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:11:15 GMT

Search dogs

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 5 March 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:

	{{blockquote\|		{{blockquote\|
-	"wildlife detection dogs operating in the field cover approximately	+	"wildlife detection dogs operating in the field cover approximately
-	5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on	+	5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on
-	various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were	+	various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were
-	found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the	+	found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the
-	field."}}	+	field."}}

Brett Wuth: New page: On this page we start to collect information on the typical effectiveness of different search techniques. This information can be used to validate the PODs reported from the field. == Se...

Brett Wuth — Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:10:37 GMT

New page: On this page we start to collect information on the typical effectiveness of different search techniques. This information can be used to validate the PODs reported from the field. == Se...

New page

On this page we start to collect information on the typical effectiveness of different search techniques. This information can be used to validate the PODs reported from the field.

== Search dogs ==

A NASAR analysis of the effectiveness of
search dog teams. There are no good statistics for SAR so wildlife
detection dogs are used to approximate.

{{blockquote|
"wildlife detection dogs operating in the field cover approximately
5 to 25 ha/hr with reported detection rates of 33% to 95% based on
various measuring systems. Lastly, wildlife detection dogs were
found to be 5 to 15 times more effective than trained humans in the
field."}}