Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6
From PCSAR
(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*** need training for the debriefer | *** need training for the debriefer | ||
* preplan 2010-05-18 | * preplan 2010-05-18 | ||
- | |||
** importance: medium | ** importance: medium | ||
+ | ** difficulty: easy |
Revision as of 01:23, 19 May 2010
Suggestion #6:
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
Debriefing forms don't match urban context. Suggest rework wording.
- preplan 2009-05-19
- add vehicle as type of team
- critical spacing only applies to Type II or Type III
- need training for the debriefer
- preplan 2009-05-19
- preplan 2010-05-18
- importance: medium
- difficulty: easy
Facts about Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6RDF feed
Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
Full page name | Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6 + |
Sequence number | 6 + |
Suggestion list | Critiques/2009-05-05 + |
Value to PCSAR mandate | not rated + |