Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0046
From PCSAR
< Critiques | 2010-03-21(Difference between revisions)
(New page: * {{sug|46}} use people that know the area, even if family ** search management team reluctant to use land owner because he was also family member. Very useful to use people that know ar...) |
m (Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug46 moved to Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0046) |
||
| (One intermediate revision not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | {{sug|46|val=none|dif=|cmte=|use people that know the area, even if family}} | |
| - | + | * search management team reluctant to use land owner because he was also family member. Very useful to use people that know area. Could have explained roads and trails. Transport. | |
| - | + | * overhead team discuss how much to include family members | |
| - | + | * be prepared to deal with consequences of including family | |
| - | + | * hasn't occurred on any real searches | |
| - | * | + | |
Current revision
Suggestion #46: use people that know the area, even if family
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: none
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
- search management team reluctant to use land owner because he was also family member. Very useful to use people that know area. Could have explained roads and trails. Transport.
- overhead team discuss how much to include family members
- be prepared to deal with consequences of including family
- hasn't occurred on any real searches
Facts about Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0046RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
| Description | use people that know the area, even if family + |
| Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0046 + |
| Sequence number | 46 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2010-03-21 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | none + |
