Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0015
From PCSAR
< Critiques | 2010-08-24(Difference between revisions)
m (Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug15 moved to Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0015) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{sug|15|val=low|Had the original message gone off right at the shale slide? Was there too much hysteria?}} | {{sug|15|val=low|Had the original message gone off right at the shale slide? Was there too much hysteria?}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not our mandate. | ||
Did public in Table Mtn incident over react? | Did public in Table Mtn incident over react? | ||
| + | |||
| + | How do we know what is fact/fiction? | ||
Reviewed at [[Members:Preplan/2010-10-19|2010-10-19 Preplan meeting]]. | Reviewed at [[Members:Preplan/2010-10-19|2010-10-19 Preplan meeting]]. | ||
Current revision
Suggestion #15: Had the original message gone off right at the shale slide? Was there too much hysteria?
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: low
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
Not our mandate.
Did public in Table Mtn incident over react?
How do we know what is fact/fiction?
Reviewed at 2010-10-19 Preplan meeting.
Facts about Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0015RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
| Description | Had the original message gone off right at the shale slide? Was there too much hysteria? + |
| Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0015 + |
| Sequence number | 15 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2010-08-24 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | low + |
