Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6
From PCSAR
< Critiques | 2009-05-05(Difference between revisions)
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | * {{sug|6 | + | * {{sug|6|val=med|dif=easy|Debriefing forms don't match urban context. Suggest rework wording.}} |
** preplan 2009-05-19 | ** preplan 2009-05-19 | ||
*** add vehicle as type of team | *** add vehicle as type of team | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*** need training for the debriefer | *** need training for the debriefer | ||
* preplan 2010-05-18 | * preplan 2010-05-18 | ||
| - | ** | + | ** Medium Value |
| - | ** | + | ** difficulty: easy |
Current revision
Suggestion #6: Debriefing forms don't match urban context. Suggest rework wording.
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: medium
- Difficulty to implement: easy
- preplan 2009-05-19
- add vehicle as type of team
- critical spacing only applies to Type II or Type III
- need training for the debriefer
- preplan 2009-05-19
- preplan 2010-05-18
- Medium Value
- difficulty: easy
Facts about Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
| Description | Debriefing forms don't match urban context. Suggest rework wording. + |
| Difficulty to implement | easy + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6 + |
| Sequence number | 6 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2009-05-05 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | medium + |
