Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0015
From PCSAR
< Critiques | 2010-03-21(Difference between revisions)
(New page: * {{sug|15}} be clear on understanding - confirm ** use of "no duff" ** focus on safety) |
m (Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug15 moved to Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0015) |
||
| (One intermediate revision not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | {{sug|15|val=none|dif=|cmte=|be clear on understanding - confirm}} | |
| - | + | * use of "no duff" | |
| - | + | * focus on safety | |
| - | + | * on mock confusing "track" as human vs. sled | |
| + | * doesn't come up as issue | ||
Current revision
Suggestion #15: be clear on understanding - confirm
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: none
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
- use of "no duff"
- focus on safety
- on mock confusing "track" as human vs. sled
- doesn't come up as issue
Facts about Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0015RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
| Description | be clear on understanding - confirm + |
| Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0015 + |
| Sequence number | 15 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2010-03-21 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | none + |

