Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0006
From PCSAR
(Difference between revisions)
												
			
			| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*** Ron: to get example  | *** Ron: to get example  | ||
** resource summary  | ** resource summary  | ||
| - | *** Brett: send to Forest  | + | *** Brett: send to Forest (done)  | 
** search urgency form  | ** search urgency form  | ||
| - | *** Brett: send to Forest  | + | *** Brett: send to Forest (done)  | 
** arrange face-to-face  | ** arrange face-to-face  | ||
*** 3 watch meetings A, B, C  | *** 3 watch meetings A, B, C  | ||
Revision as of 01:51, 19 May 2010
Suggestion #6:
- Committee handling: unassigned
 - Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
 -  Difficulty to implement: not rated
orient new RCMP 
- high
 
-  2010-04-20
- losing our liaison
 -  call out procedures
- plasticized business cards
 
 - easy
 
 -  plan
-  get more business card plasticized
- Ron: to get example
 
 -  resource summary
- Brett: send to Forest (done)
 
 -  search urgency form
- Brett: send to Forest (done)
 
 -  arrange face-to-face
- 3 watch meetings A, B, C
 - what resources we have
 - equipment
 - typical things we respond to
 
 
 -  get more business card plasticized
 
Facts about Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0006RDF feed
						
			
		| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + | 
| Difficulty to implement | not rated + | 
| Full page name | Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0006 + | 
| Sequence number | 6 + | 
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2010-03-21 + | 
| Value to PCSAR mandate | not rated + | 

