Critiques
From PCSAR
(Difference between revisions)
(→See also) |
|||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
* [[SAR Fundamentals/Critique|how we train people to participate in critiques]] | * [[SAR Fundamentals/Critique|how we train people to participate in critiques]] | ||
* [http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/pdf/efop/efo34648.pdf paper on why critiques] | * [http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/pdf/efop/efo34648.pdf paper on why critiques] | ||
| + | * [http://www.emergency-response-planning.com/blog/bid/32873/10-Points-for-a-Post-Incident-Management-Critique template] | ||
* [http://www.columbiasc.net/downloads/Fire/OPS-033.pdf example Standard Operating Procedure] | * [http://www.columbiasc.net/downloads/Fire/OPS-033.pdf example Standard Operating Procedure] | ||
* [http://www.burlingtonkyfire.org/PoliciesGuidelines/1400.11-Post%20Incident%20Critique.pdf Burlington Fire standard operating policy] | * [http://www.burlingtonkyfire.org/PoliciesGuidelines/1400.11-Post%20Incident%20Critique.pdf Burlington Fire standard operating policy] | ||
Revision as of 21:54, 8 March 2011
Critiques are one of the most effective ways PC SAR has to improve the manner in which it works. The purpose of a critique is not to be critical but to share an understanding of what worked well and what could be improved.
PC SAR performs a critique after all but minor incidents.
Our preference is to use a SAR Manager that was not involved in the incident to give an unbiased chairing of the critique.
Tasks
- Prepare for the meeting
- Pick a time (Tuesday evening?) when most participants in the search are available.
- book a room (FireHall, MDMeetingRoom)
- Announce by e-mail or call-out.
- Have someone (usually the last Search Manager involved) draft a 1 page summary of the incident. (see Incident Summary Form Task)
- Invite the tasking agency and other organizations we worked with to send a representative. Many SAR groups are listed at: http://www.saralberta.org/groupmap/groups.html
- Decide whether snacks are needed and arrange them.
- Collect suggestions from those members that can't attend.
Your effort: 1 hr
- Chair the meeting.
- Ask someone to take detailed notes.
- Sample agenda (usually there is not enough time for all of these items; focus on the important ones)
- introductions
- sign in (to the critique)
- confidentiality
- brief report from person in charge of post op activities (last search manager?) re expenses, lost and found, work needing doing, etc.
- what a critique is
- understanding
- learning, improvement
- suggestions, ideas
- how suggestions will be distributed
- committees that will make decisions on suggestions
- incident summary (from draft 1-page report)
- functional areas of incident
- first notification / tasking
- call-out
- investigation
- communications
- resources
- family liaison
- (de)briefing
- searching
- extrication
- stand down
- CISM
- prevention, public education
- travel
- logistics
- planning
- media
- post ops
- learning (critique, exercise goals/techniques)
- round table (anyone have points that they need to bring up that wasn't already mentioned)
Your effort: 1.5 hrs
- Report
- Edit the incident summary to include information that came out in the critique.
- Sort and write up the suggestions (we have examples of this). See PCSAR Doc-97 on [1]
- Assign suggestions to be reviewed by PC SAR board, PC SAR preplan committee, PC SAR equipment committee, PC SAR call out committee or one of our partner organizations.
- Forward your report to each group.
- Send the sign-in list from the critique to the Membership Coordinator.
Your effort: 2.5 hrs.
Critique notes
- /2009-05-05 : mock search, Anderson search
- /2009-09-23 : Perry search
- /2010-03-21 : avalanche, mock search
- /2010-08-24 : quad, Table Mountain incidents
- /2011-01-18
