Preplan/Committee/To prioritize

From PCSAR

< Preplan | Committee
Revision as of 00:25, 19 May 2010 by Brett Wuth (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3:

Suggestion #3: Merging teams can cause confusion in command/reporting structure. Suggest clear language of merging vs. working together. Suggest switch to single FRS channel for new team.
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: low
Difficulty to implement: hard
  • preplan 2009-05-19
    • need clear language of team designations, designation of combined team
    • need clear designation of combined team leader
  • preplan 2010-05-18
    • overhead team can make effort to always have team leader designated
    • can practice developing leadership
    • can have SOP
Facts about Preplan/Committee/To prioritizeRDF feed
Committee handling Suggestion/Committee/List/training  +
Description Merging teams can cause confusion in command/reporting structure. Suggest clear language of merging vs. working together. Suggest switch to single FRS channel for new team.  +
Difficulty to implement hard  +
Full page name Preplan/Committee/To prioritize  +
Sequence number 3  +
Suggestion list Preplan/Committee  +
Value to PCSAR mandate low  +
Personal tools