Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0003
From PCSAR
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{sug|3|cmte=Board| | + | {{sug|3|cmte=Board|val=high| |
Suggest Lethbridge dispatch also have our contact numbers | Suggest Lethbridge dispatch also have our contact numbers | ||
as they were trying to stand us down. | as they were trying to stand us down. | ||
Pat N. to talk to dispatch | Pat N. to talk to dispatch | ||
| + | |||
| + | Brett check with Pat, or follow up with Lethbridge Dispatch | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 04:50, 10 October 2010
Suggestion #3: Suggest Lethbridge dispatch also have our contact numbers
as they were trying to stand us down.
Pat N. to talk to dispatch
Brett check with Pat, or follow up with Lethbridge Dispatch
- Committee handling: board
- Value to PCSAR mandate: high
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
Facts about Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0003RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/board + |
| Description | Suggest Lethbridge dispatch also have our contact numbers
as they were trying to stand us down. Pat N. to talk to dispatch Brett check with Pat, or follow up with Lethbridge Dispatch + |
| Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0003 + |
| Sequence number | 3 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2009-09-23 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | high + |
