Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0002

From PCSAR

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{sug|2|val=high|dif=easy|All Search Mangers should have phone contacts for EMS ambulance in order to improve on inter-agency communication and avoid mistaken directions including Channel(s) 1&2.}}
+
{{sug|2|val=high|dif=easy|cmte=train, preplan|All Search Mangers should have phone contacts for EMS ambulance in order to improve on inter-agency communication and avoid mistaken directions including Channel(s) 1&2.}}
 +
Search managers and net control should know that we
 +
should use Channel 1 as preferred means of communicating with PCES during incidents.
 +
* Verify with PCES
 +
Channel 2 is simplex.
 +
 
 +
Considered, but rejected: having cell phone numbers of ambulances. Won't know which ambulance is deployed.
 +
 
Action: Address in SAR Training
Action: Address in SAR Training

Revision as of 05:48, 20 October 2010


Suggestion #2: All Search Mangers should have phone contacts for EMS ambulance in order to improve on inter-agency communication and avoid mistaken directions including Channel(s) 1&2.

Committee handling: error
Value to PCSAR mandate: high
Difficulty to implement: easy

Search managers and net control should know that we should use Channel 1 as preferred means of communicating with PCES during incidents.

  • Verify with PCES

Channel 2 is simplex.

Considered, but rejected: having cell phone numbers of ambulances. Won't know which ambulance is deployed.

Action: Address in SAR Training

Facts about Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0002RDF feed
Committee handling Suggestion/Committee/List/error  +
Description All Search Mangers should have phone contacts for EMS ambulance in order to improve on inter-agency communication and avoid mistaken directions including Channel(s) 1&2.  +
Difficulty to implement easy  +
Full page name Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0002  +
Sequence number 2  +
Suggestion list Critiques/2010-08-24  +
Value to PCSAR mandate high  +
Retrieved from "http://pcsar.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php/Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0002"