Preplan/Committee/To prioritize

From PCSAR

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
{{quote-page|Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug23}}
{{quote-page|Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug23}}
{{quote-page|Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug44}}
{{quote-page|Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug44}}
 +
{{quote-page|Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug46}}
 +
{{quote-page|Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug49}}

Revision as of 04:35, 19 May 2010

Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug17:

Suggestion #17: Suggest continued use of carpooling to search in e.g. Lethbridge. Better safety on way back when tired
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: medium
Difficulty to implement: done

preplan 2009-05-19

  • agreed

preplan 2010-06-15

  • no value: already doing


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug18:

Suggestion #18: Suggest having arrangement to call-in when driving alone back from a tiring search (e.g. night search). To confirm safe arrival
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: high
Difficulty to implement: done
    • preplan 2009-05-19
      • someone on team should take responsibility to arrange for call-in
  • preplan 2010-05-15
    • already policy
    • should practice in night mock search
    • should be on list for search managers
  • preplan 2011-11-15
    • focus on issue of driving alone
    • what does the call accomplish after the accident, doesn't address safety issue.
    • if balking from tasking agency, we can rent room and charge tasking agency. Or we can pay out of contingency fund.
    • similar issue if the roads are bad
    • training?
    • everyone is responsible for safety, everyone should feel free to make the suggestion
    • make it really easy for them to stay
    • ultimately it's their call
    • when safety issue is handled, no need for accountability
    • notification on return, only if traveling against safety suggestion to wait
      • alternative can let spouse know when should arrive
    • (review tasked: Brett Wuth) write up as rule of thumb


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug19:

Suggestion #19: Suggest encourage members in field to discuss overhead decisions after search as learning opportunity
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
  • preplan 2009-05-19
    • give big picture briefing, rationale


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug20:

Suggestion #20: Suggest everyone get experience of working comms and command post
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug21:

Suggestion #21: Suggest better learning if everyone can see handling of first approach to subject.
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug14:

Suggestion #14: + field communication
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: none
Difficulty to implement: done

focus on strengths of certain people as command post radio operator

  • already doing, never comes up in real searches


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug15:

Suggestion #15: be clear on understanding - confirm
Committee handling: unassigned
Value to PCSAR mandate: none
Difficulty to implement: not rated
  • use of "no duff"
  • focus on safety
  • on mock confusing "track" as human vs. sled
  • doesn't come up as issue


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug23:

Suggestion #23: Reports to distinguish types of tracks, footprints vs. sleds
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: low
Difficulty to implement: done
  • repeat
  • new trainees were the ones that were confusing
  • should be straigtened out right away by radio operator or search manager


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug44:

Suggestion #44: facilitate vehicle access to search site
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: low
Difficulty to implement: hard
  • shutdown highway to get SAR teams into resort
  • difficulty of dust
  • tasking agency

only the RCMP can shut down road, we might request

  • only one incident where has came up
  • lots of other possible entries onto the road
    • could assume road closed, when unexpected traffic


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug46:

Suggestion #46: use people that know the area, even if family
Committee handling: unassigned
Value to PCSAR mandate: none
Difficulty to implement: not rated
  • search management team reluctant to use land owner because he was also family member. Very useful to use people that know area. Could have explained roads and trails. Transport.
  • overhead team discuss how much to include family members
  • be prepared to deal with consequences of including family
  • hasn't occurred on any real searches


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug49:

Suggestion #49: assign task through central pt
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: low
Difficulty to implement: done
  • incident specific (don't expect to ever happen again)
  • use CMR Safety Office

2013-01-15 preplan: MOU with CMR should solve further issues

Facts about Preplan/Committee/To prioritizeRDF feed
Committee handling Suggestion/Committee/List/preplan  +, Suggestion/Committee/List/training  +, and Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned  +
Description Suggest continued use of carpooling to search in e.g. Lethbridge. Better safety on way back when tired  +, Suggest having arrangement to call-in when driving alone back from a tiring search (e.g. night search). To confirm safe arrival  +, Suggest encourage members in field to discuss overhead decisions after search as learning opportunity  +, Suggest everyone get experience of working comms and command post  +, Suggest better learning if everyone can see handling of first approach to subject.  +, + field communication  +, be clear on understanding - confirm  +, Reports to distinguish types of tracks, footprints vs. sleds  +, facilitate vehicle access to search site  +, use people that know the area, even if family  +, and assign task through central pt  +
Difficulty to implement done  +, not rated  +, and hard  +
Full page name Preplan/Committee/To prioritize  +
Review tasked  +
Sequence number 17  +, 18  +, 19  +, 20  +, 21  +, 14  +, 15  +, 23  +, 44  +, 46  +, and 49  +
Suggestion list Preplan/Committee  +
Value to PCSAR mandate medium  +, high  +, not rated  +, none  +, and low  +
Personal tools