Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug1
From PCSAR
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*** Use regular members to fill in gaps for on-call caller. Refer to training. | *** Use regular members to fill in gaps for on-call caller. Refer to training. | ||
*** Easy to recruit for (e.g. high schoolers). | *** Easy to recruit for (e.g. high schoolers). | ||
| - | *** identified as priority | + | *** identified as priority high |
** preplan 2009-09-15 | ** preplan 2009-09-15 | ||
*** annual meeting of call out people | *** annual meeting of call out people | ||
Revision as of 00:22, 19 May 2010
Suggestion #1:
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
Not able to get call-out people on incidents. Suggest have lead call-out coordinator on-call for month or 2 week period like manager-on-call. Suggest get more call-out people.
- preplan 2009-05-19
- Good to have on-call caller.
- Use regular members to fill in gaps for on-call caller. Refer to training.
- Easy to recruit for (e.g. high schoolers).
- identified as priority high
- preplan 2009-09-15
- annual meeting of call out people
- Oct 20
- get their buy in
- get more call out people
- recruitment
- annual meeting of call out people
- preplan 2010-04-20
- medium difficulty
- requires more work
- preplan 2009-05-19
Facts about Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug1RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
| Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug1 + |
| Sequence number | 1 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2009-05-05 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | not rated + |
