Preplan/Committee/To prioritize

From PCSAR

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{quote-page|Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3}})
Line 1: Line 1:
{{quote-page|Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3}}
{{quote-page|Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3}}
 +
{{quote-page|Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug4}}
 +
{{quote-page|Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6}}

Revision as of 00:28, 19 May 2010

Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3:

Suggestion #3: Merging teams can cause confusion in command/reporting structure. Suggest clear language of merging vs. working together. Suggest switch to single FRS channel for new team.
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: low
Difficulty to implement: hard
  • preplan 2009-05-19
    • need clear language of team designations, designation of combined team
    • need clear designation of combined team leader
  • preplan 2010-05-18
    • overhead team can make effort to always have team leader designated
    • can practice developing leadership
    • can have SOP


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug4:

Suggestion #4: Suggest get gel pens which won't freeze.
Committee handling: unassigned
Value to PCSAR mandate: none
Difficulty to implement: not rated
  • preplan 2010-05-18
    • no action
    • can just keep pen in inside pocket


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug6:

  • Suggestion #6: Debriefing forms don't match urban context. Suggest rework wording.
Committee handling: unassigned
Value to PCSAR mandate: medium
Difficulty to implement: easy
    • preplan 2009-05-19
      • add vehicle as type of team
      • critical spacing only applies to Type II or Type III
      • need training for the debriefer
  • preplan 2010-05-18
    • Medium Value
    • difficulty: easy
Facts about Preplan/Committee/To prioritizeRDF feed
Committee handling Suggestion/Committee/List/training  +, and Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned  +
Description Merging teams can cause confusion in command/reporting structure. Suggest clear language of merging vs. working together. Suggest switch to single FRS channel for new team.  +, Suggest get gel pens which won't freeze.  +, and Debriefing forms don't match urban context. Suggest rework wording.  +
Difficulty to implement hard  +, not rated  +, and easy  +
Full page name Preplan/Committee/To prioritize  +
Sequence number 3  +, 4  +, and 6  +
Suggestion list Preplan/Committee  +
Value to PCSAR mandate low  +, none  +, and medium  +
Retrieved from "http://pcsar.dyndns.org:8080/mediawiki/index.php/Preplan/Committee/To_prioritize"
Personal tools