Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0034
From PCSAR
(Difference between revisions)
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** how to handle flagging being taken off | ** how to handle flagging being taken off | ||
** coordinate with other agencies | ** coordinate with other agencies | ||
- | ** | + | ** High Value |
* 2010-04-20 preplan mtg | * 2010-04-20 preplan mtg | ||
** need to understand rationale, theory | ** need to understand rationale, theory | ||
** combine with [[Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug29]] | ** combine with [[Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug29]] |
Revision as of 03:37, 19 May 2010
Suggestion #34:
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
accountability process (vehicles, houses, etc.)
- + simple accountability (flagging)
- Check vehicles that aren't associated with staff.
- Flag vehicle you know. Staff, searchers.
- Clarification needed on process for vehicle accountability 3 different ways of doing it. Same for flagging houses.
- Use marked tape. "Search and Rescue"
- use of colours to distinguish different status
- how to handle flagging being taken off
- coordinate with other agencies
- High Value
- 2010-04-20 preplan mtg
- need to understand rationale, theory
- combine with Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug29
Facts about Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0034RDF feed
Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
Full page name | Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0034 + |
Sequence number | 34 + |
Suggestion list | Critiques/2010-03-21 + |
Value to PCSAR mandate | not rated + |