Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0059
From PCSAR
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | {{sug|59|val=high|dif=medium|cmte=preplan|visible identification (vests?) - responders}} | |
| - | + | ||
* 2010-04-20 preplan mtg | * 2010-04-20 preplan mtg | ||
** vests were in SARCAR, but SARCAR was not required | ** vests were in SARCAR, but SARCAR was not required | ||
| - | |||
* 2010-05-18 preplan mtg | * 2010-05-18 preplan mtg | ||
** some vests were in equipment trailer, which went out | ** some vests were in equipment trailer, which went out | ||
** could issue to each member (or those that regularly respond) | ** could issue to each member (or those that regularly respond) | ||
Revision as of 22:04, 8 June 2010
Suggestion #59: visible identification (vests?) - responders
- Committee handling: preplan
- Value to PCSAR mandate: high
- Difficulty to implement: medium
- 2010-04-20 preplan mtg
- vests were in SARCAR, but SARCAR was not required
- 2010-05-18 preplan mtg
- some vests were in equipment trailer, which went out
- could issue to each member (or those that regularly respond)
Facts about Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0059RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/preplan + |
| Description | visible identification (vests?) - responders + |
| Difficulty to implement | medium + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug/0059 + |
| Sequence number | 59 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2010-03-21 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | high + |
