Preplan/Committee/To prioritize

From PCSAR

Jump to: navigation, search
Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug17:

Suggestion #17: Suggest continued use of carpooling to search in e.g. Lethbridge. Better safety on way back when tired
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: medium
Difficulty to implement: done

preplan 2009-05-19

  • agreed

preplan 2010-06-15

  • no value: already doing


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug18:

Suggestion #18: Suggest having arrangement to call-in when driving alone back from a tiring search (e.g. night search). To confirm safe arrival
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: high
Difficulty to implement: done
    • preplan 2009-05-19
      • someone on team should take responsibility to arrange for call-in
  • preplan 2010-05-15
    • already policy
    • should practice in night mock search
    • should be on list for search managers
  • preplan 2011-11-15
    • focus on issue of driving alone
    • what does the call accomplish after the accident, doesn't address safety issue.
    • if balking from tasking agency, we can rent room and charge tasking agency. Or we can pay out of contingency fund.
    • similar issue if the roads are bad
    • training?
    • everyone is responsible for safety, everyone should feel free to make the suggestion
    • make it really easy for them to stay
    • ultimately it's their call
    • when safety issue is handled, no need for accountability
    • notification on return, only if traveling against safety suggestion to wait
      • alternative can let spouse know when should arrive
    • (review tasked: Brett Wuth) write up as rule of thumb


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug19:

Suggestion #19: Suggest encourage members in field to discuss overhead decisions after search as learning opportunity
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
  • preplan 2009-05-19
    • give big picture briefing, rationale


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug20:

Suggestion #20: Suggest everyone get experience of working comms and command post
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated


Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug21:

Suggestion #21: Suggest better learning if everyone can see handling of first approach to subject.
Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug14:

Suggestion #14: + field communication
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: none
Difficulty to implement: done

focus on strengths of certain people as command post radio operator

  • already doing, never comes up in real searches


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug15:

Suggestion #15: be clear on understanding - confirm
Committee handling: unassigned
Value to PCSAR mandate: none
Difficulty to implement: not rated
  • use of "no duff"
  • focus on safety
  • on mock confusing "track" as human vs. sled
  • doesn't come up as issue


Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug23:

Suggestion #23: Reports to distinguish types of tracks, footprints vs. sleds
Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: low
Difficulty to implement: done
  • repeat
  • new trainees were the ones that were confusing
  • should be straigtened out right away by radio operator or search manager
Facts about Preplan/Committee/To prioritizeRDF feed
Committee handling Suggestion/Committee/List/preplan  +, Suggestion/Committee/List/training  +, and Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned  +
Description Suggest continued use of carpooling to search in e.g. Lethbridge. Better safety on way back when tired  +, Suggest having arrangement to call-in when driving alone back from a tiring search (e.g. night search). To confirm safe arrival  +, Suggest encourage members in field to discuss overhead decisions after search as learning opportunity  +, Suggest everyone get experience of working comms and command post  +, Suggest better learning if everyone can see handling of first approach to subject.  +, + field communication  +, be clear on understanding - confirm  +, and Reports to distinguish types of tracks, footprints vs. sleds  +
Difficulty to implement done  +, and not rated  +
Full page name Preplan/Committee/To prioritize  +
Review tasked  +
Sequence number 17  +, 18  +, 19  +, 20  +, 21  +, 14  +, 15  +, and 23  +
Suggestion list Preplan/Committee  +
Value to PCSAR mandate medium  +, high  +, not rated  +, none  +, and low  +
Retrieved from "http://pcsar.dyndns.org:8080/mediawiki/index.php/Preplan/Committee/To_prioritize"
Personal tools