Editing Critiques
From PCSAR
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Current revision | Your text | ||
Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
**: leading questions: How could this incident have been prevented? Was this incident used to educated the public? | **: leading questions: How could this incident have been prevented? Was this incident used to educated the public? | ||
** travel | ** travel | ||
- | **: leading questions: How did responders get to and from | + | **: leading questions: How did responders get to and from the site? Were convoys used? Was there a need for people to check in when they returned? Was travel safety evaluated? |
** Plans Section | ** Plans Section | ||
**: leading questions: What preplans were in place to help with this incident? Were maps, situation reports, weather and hazard forecasts provided to all who needed them? Was the selection of team assignments guided by analysis of the situation? Was the plan for the next op period ready before it started? Were clues, PODs, map updates and recommendations from the field being used to focus search efforts and provide updated information to teams going to the field? | **: leading questions: What preplans were in place to help with this incident? Were maps, situation reports, weather and hazard forecasts provided to all who needed them? Was the selection of team assignments guided by analysis of the situation? Was the plan for the next op period ready before it started? Were clues, PODs, map updates and recommendations from the field being used to focus search efforts and provide updated information to teams going to the field? |