Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0002
From PCSAR
< Critiques | 2009-09-23(Difference between revisions)
m (Members:Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0002 moved to Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0002 over redirect) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{sug|2|cmte=Preplan| | + | {{sug|2|cmte=Preplan|val=low|dif=done| |
We could have been used in other areas if frontline | We could have been used in other areas if frontline | ||
were only armed personel. | were only armed personel. | ||
Current revision
Suggestion #2: We could have been used in other areas if frontline
were only armed personel.
Maybe even assist armed people.
Should have consulted bear dog team or bear expert.
- Committee handling: preplan
- Value to PCSAR mandate: low
- Difficulty to implement: done
Facts about Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0002RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/preplan + |
| Description | We could have been used in other areas if frontline
were only armed personel. Maybe even assist armed people. Should have consulted bear dog team or bear expert. + |
| Difficulty to implement | done + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2009-09-23/Sug/0002 + |
| Sequence number | 2 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2009-09-23 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | low + |
