Editing SAR Fundamentals/Critique

From PCSAR

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

== Subject ==
{{prompt|What is this lesson plan about?}}

== Authors ==	
{{prompt|List who wrote this lesson plan.}}

== Scope ==
{{prompt|What is included in this lesson, what's not and why.}}
: critique of night search

== Session purpose ==

Thank you for agreeing to chair the critique on Sunday of the mock
search.  The time scheduled is for 1 hour, so this is a bit
more compressed than most critiques, but we're restricted by the other
course requirements.

The purpose of this session is first to get the students to understand
what a critique is and how to participate in it.  Secondly the
students are given an opportunity to discuss and consolidate their
learnings from the previous night's mock search.   And finally, like
all critiques, this is an opportunity for PCSAR to learn from the
experience of the mock search and find ways to improve its operation
in future incidents.

You asked for reference material on critiques.  I was surprised that I
couldn't find any useful information in either the old manual or the
new one.  I did some googling and found some material, but not a lot.
It seemed to miss some of the major points we've adopted in running a
good critique.
* using a knowledgeable but uninvolved chair
* inviting all stakeholders
* summarizing the facts first
* focusing on what worked well as well as what could be improved
* gathering the discussion into functional area
* including a round table

The fact that I'm not seeing these in writing elsewhere leaves me a
bit unsure as to where these ideas came from.  Have we received them
orally?  Did we evolved them ourselves over time?

It suggest we have an opportunity to lead in this area by starting to
put these ideas down on paper.

What we have written so far, you can find at these two links on the
wiki:

* [[SAR_Fundamentals/Critique]]

* [[Critiques]]

This is the same material you've worked with before.

If you'd like to develop them further for your presentation/critique
please do.

The idea is that we run an abbreviated real critique of the previous night search. In the process we help the students to understand what a critque is, why we have them, how they're run and how they can participate.  That's the main purpose of this section.  But along the way we also attain the secondary purposes:
* consolidate their learnings from the night search
* provide feedback which helps us to put together better training next year
* identify areas we can work on as an organization

== Prerequisites ==
{{prompt|What should students already know/have accomplished before the lesson is presented.}}

== Objectives ==
At the conclusion of this lesson the participants:
# will be able to ...

== Time Plan ==
Total Time: 60 minutes
:: 2005-02 : 15 min
:: 2006-09-30 : 51 min
:: 2008-02-07 : 34 min
:: 2013-02: 62 min

Critique

* how often
* when done
* confidentiality
* not criticism
* stages
    * first notification / tasking
    * call-out
    * investigation
    * communications
    * resources
    * family liaison
    * briefing
    * searching
    * extrication
    * stand down
    * CISM
    * prevention, public education
    * travel
    * logistics
    * planning
    * media
    * post ops
    * critique (how this critique was organized)

See: [[Critiques]]

{{lesson slides start}}
{{lesson slide|00:00|3 min}}
Introduce topic title

Introduce Instructor

Present Objectives
{{lesson slide|00:03|}}
instructional points in normal font

''aids, exercises, activities in italic''
{{lesson slides end}}

== Aids ==
{{prompt|What materials are needed or useful in presenting this lesson.}}

== Question bank ==
{{prompt|List of questions suitable for an review/exam of this section.}}
See {{subpage|Question bank}}

== Frequently Asked Questions ==
{{prompt|What are some of the questions that students typically ask.  Include the answers.}}

== Feedback ==
{{prompt|When has this lesson been presented.  What was the feedback.}}

== License ==
{{prompt|What can others do with this lesson?}}

Recommended license below.  Fill in the year and the author's name(s):

Copyright © YEAR, Author.  
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 Canada License.
To view a copy of this license, visit 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ca/
or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

== Reference Material ==
{{prompt|If you need to cite sources, do so here.}}

[1]

== Notes ==
{{prompt|Any additional notes, etc.}}

Please note that all contributions to PCSAR are considered to be released under the Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (see PCSAR:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!

Summary:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page:

Retrieved from "http://pcsar.dyndns.org:8080/mediawiki/index.php/SAR_Fundamentals/Critique"

Editing SAR Fundamentals/Critique

From PCSAR

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Toolbox

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 orally?  Did we evolved them ourselves over time?
-It suggests we have an opportunity to lead in this area by starting to
+It suggest we have an opportunity to lead in this area by starting to
 put these ideas down on paper.