Training/Committee

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 22:33, 8 June 2010

These tasks and suggestions have been referred to the Training Committee.

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug13:*
Suggestion #13: precise communications - track description Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: high Difficulty to implement: not rated

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug33:*
Suggestion #33: tracking - preserve intersection and funnel points Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: high Difficulty to implement: not rated when tracking, when coming to intersection, gate, check natural traps, gates, etc. check for sign before going in. training objective

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug39:*
Suggestion #39: decision making around patient transport Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: high Difficulty to implement: not rated judgement call training: more practice with these scenarios Incorporates Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug40: protocol for subject movement Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug41: Need training on medical decision making in the field.

*Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug13:*
Suggestion #13: Discussion of degree of discretion to work outside assigned segment. Suggest need for clarification of when should talk to command post vs. decide on own. Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: medium Difficulty to implement: not rated preplan 2009-05-19 a quick burst doesn't need to be communicated should be reported in debriefing a diversion or abandoning original assignment does need to be communicated training issue preplan 2010-05-18 give to training Medium Value

*Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug14:*
Suggestion #14: Suggest when spotting subject, maintain visual contact until part of party approaches. Can lose perspective as approach. Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: medium Difficulty to implement: not rated preplan 2009-05-19 should be brought up during training preplan 2010-05-18 see Suggestion 12.

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug16:*
Suggestion #16: too much radio traffic - finish conversation / standby Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: medium Difficulty to implement: not rated training for radio operator,

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug21:*
Suggestion #21: being able to state urgency level of comm Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: medium Difficulty to implement: not rated train "break"

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug22:*
Suggestion #22: "Stand by" does not mean stop activity Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: medium Difficulty to implement: not rated

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug37:*
Suggestion #37: type 1 search on narrow trail: walk 1 behind the other, 1 look forward, 1 left, 1 right Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: medium Difficulty to implement: not rated

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug35:*
Suggestion #35: Keep sharpie in pack to mark tape Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: low Difficulty to implement: not rated

*Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug36:*
Suggestion #36: bystanders asking questions Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: low Difficulty to implement: not rated need higher trained person as TL, would know to send to contact.

*Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3:*
Suggestion #3: Merging teams can cause confusion in command/reporting structure. Suggest clear language of merging vs. working together. Suggest switch to single FRS channel for new team. Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: low Difficulty to implement: hard preplan 2009-05-19 need clear language of team designations, designation of combined team need clear designation of combined team leader preplan 2010-05-18 overhead team can make effort to always have team leader designated can practice developing leadership can have SOP

*Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug12:*
Suggestion #12: Suggest search areas that are difficult can be reexamined by strategically spotting from point of advantage. E.g. thick brush along creek spotted from other side. Committee handling: training Value to PCSAR mandate: medium Difficulty to implement: easy preplan 2009-05-19 should be brought up during training remind overhead to plan on macro scale preplan 2010-05-18 need to maintain visual contact (e.g. spotting) while teams are moving in

Committee handling	Suggestion/Committee/List/training +
Description	precise communications - track description +, tracking - preserve intersection and funnel points +, decision making around patient transport +, Discussion of degree of discretion to work outside assigned segment. Suggest need for clarification of when should talk to command post vs. decide on own. +, Suggest when spotting subject, maintain visual contact until part of party approaches. Can lose perspective as approach. +, too much radio traffic - finish conversation / standby +, being able to state urgency level of comm +, "Stand by" does not mean stop activity +, type 1 search on narrow trail: walk 1 behind the other, 1 look forward, 1 left, 1 right +, Keep sharpie in pack to mark tape +, bystanders asking questions +, Merging teams can cause confusion in command/reporting structure. Suggest clear language of merging vs. working together. Suggest switch to single FRS channel for new team. +, and Suggest search areas that are difficult can be reexamined by strategically spotting from point of advantage. E.g. thick brush along creek spotted from other side. +
Difficulty to implement	not rated +, hard +, and easy +
Full page name	Training/Committee +
Sequence number	13 +, 33 +, 39 +, 14 +, 16 +, 21 +, 22 +, 37 +, 35 +, 36 +, 3 +, and 12 +
Suggestion list	Training +
Value to PCSAR mandate	high +, medium +, and low +

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 {{quote-page|Critiques/2010-03-21/Sug36}}
 {{quote-page|Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3}}
+{{quote-page|Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug12}}