Current revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
- | {{Lesson plan/Header}}
| + | == Objectives == |
- | | + | * Students will demonstrate the ability to |
- | == Subject == | + | ** call for clarity of leadership |
- | {{prompt|What is this lesson plan about?}}
| + | ** assume leadership |
- | | + | ** resolve issues of leadership between themselves and others |
- | == Authors ==
| + | ** hand-off leadership |
- | {{prompt|List who wrote this lesson plan.}}
| + | == Application == |
- | * Brett Wuth | + | |
- | == Scope == | + | |
- | {{prompt|What is included in this lesson, what's not and why.}}
| + | |
| * working with other SAR groups | | * working with other SAR groups |
| * working with other agencies | | * working with other agencies |
- | * merging field teams
| |
- |
| |
| == Addresses == | | == Addresses == |
| * [[Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug21]] | | * [[Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug21]] |
| ** General training - every team needs a leader. | | ** General training - every team needs a leader. |
| ** Renew training for all members, including senior members, that whenever together must identify a team leader. | | ** Renew training for all members, including senior members, that whenever together must identify a team leader. |
- | * [[Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug10]]
| |
- | ** clarify roles and command structure/hierarchy when several agencies are involved in/responding to the same incident.
| |
- | * [[Critiques/2009-05-05/Sug3]]
| |
- | ** Merging teams can cause confusion in command/reporting structure. Suggest clear language of merging vs. working together. Suggest switch to single FRS channel for new team.
| |
- | ** need clear language of team designations, designation of combined team
| |
- | ** need clear designation of combined team leader
| |
- | ** overhead team can make effort to always have team leader designated
| |
- | ** can practice developing leadership
| |
- |
| |
- | == Prerequisites ==
| |
- | {{prompt|What should students already know/have accomplished before the lesson is presented.}}
| |
- |
| |
- | == Objectives ==
| |
- | At the conclusion of this lesson the participants:
| |
- | * will demonstrate the ability to
| |
- | ** call for clarity of leadership
| |
- | ** assume leadership
| |
- | ** resolve issues of leadership between themselves and others
| |
- | ** hand-off leadership
| |
- |
| |
- | == Time Plan ==
| |
- | Total Time: ?? minutes
| |
- |
| |
- | {{lesson slides start}}
| |
- | {{lesson slide|00:00|3 min}}
| |
- | Introduce topic title
| |
- |
| |
- | Introduce Instructor
| |
- |
| |
- | Present Objectives
| |
- |
| |
- | {{lesson slide|00:03|}}
| |
- | '''present outline of ICS org structure'''
| |
- | * Inicident Commander
| |
- | * Operations Section Chief
| |
- | * Planning Section Chief
| |
- | * Logistics Section Chief
| |
- | * Finance/Admin Section Chief
| |
- | * Ground Search Team Unit (Leader, Members)
| |
- | * Call Out Team
| |
- | * Agency Executive
| |
- |
| |
- | {{lesson slide||}}
| |
- | When position is not filled, the next position up does the job.
| |
- |
| |
- | * May not be enough work for a dedicated person
| |
- | * May not be enough people yet
| |
- |
| |
- | * Expand and collapse as needed
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | {{lesson slide||}}
| |
- | Scenario
| |
- |
| |
- | Sunday morning May 19, 2013, Victoria Day weekend, Beautiful weekend.
| |
- |
| |
- | PCSAR gets a call from RCMP upon a report of a 5-year girl missing
| |
- | from a random campsite on the Carbondale river.
| |
- |
| |
- | PCSAR is tasked. A search manager is in charge. Call-out has been
| |
- | activated for ground searchers, quads, and road vehicles.
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | {{lesson slide||}}
| |
- | Who do you report to?
| |
- | * when requested
| |
- | * when signed in
| |
- | * when assigned field task
| |
- | * when debriefed
| |
- | * when available for reassignment
| |
- | * when released, returning home
| |
- |
| |
- | {{lesson slide||}}
| |
- | Principles
| |
- | * everybody reports to somebody
| |
- | * everybody report to only one person -- Unity of Command
| |
- | * everyone on the incident reports up the chain eventually to the same person - Chain of Command
| |
- |
| |
- | Why?
| |
- | * Efficiency in an emergency
| |
- |
| |
- | {{lesson slides end}}
| |
- |
| |
- | == Aids ==
| |
- | {{prompt|What materials are needed or useful in presenting this lesson.}}
| |
- |
| |
- | == Question bank ==
| |
- | {{prompt|List of questions suitable for an review/exam of this section.}}
| |
- | == Frequently Asked Questions ==
| |
- | {{prompt|What are some of the questions that students typically ask. Include the answers.}}
| |
- |
| |
- | == Feedback ==
| |
- | {{prompt|When has this lesson been presented. What was the feedback.}}
| |
- |
| |
- | == License ==
| |
- | {{prompt|What can others do with this lesson?}}
| |
- |
| |
- | Recommended license below. Fill in the year and the author's name(s):
| |
- |
| |
- | Copyright © 2012, Brett Wuth.
| |
- | This work is licensed under a
| |
- | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 Canada License.
| |
- | To view a copy of this license, visit
| |
- | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ca/
| |
- | or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
| |
- |
| |
- | == Reference Material ==
| |
- | {{prompt|If you need to cite sources, do so here.}}
| |
- | Related lesson plans:
| |
- | * [[2000-12-05 being in charge/Lesson plan]]
| |
- | * [[2009-03-03 mtg/Overhead tabletop]]
| |
- |
| |
- | == Notes ==
| |
- | {{prompt|Any additional notes, etc.}}
| |
- |
| |
- | * Should always know "Who am I reporting to?"
| |
- | ** If don't know, ask.
| |
- | ** Report to only one person -- Unity of Command
| |
- | *** not two different people or two different organizations, two different branches
| |
- | *** not to both your team leader and your team leader's leader
| |
- | **** give examples using ICS chart
| |
- | *** "Am I reporting to you and no longer to ... ?" "I need to get a message to ... that I'm not longer reporting to that person."
| |
- | ** No one knows who you report to.
| |
- | *** "Who do you report to?" Follow the chain up until you find someone that can tell you who you should report to.
| |
- | * If all you find are people that don't know who they themselves report to ...
| |
- | ** No chain of command
| |
- | ** Have you tried using radio / phone to contact more senior personnel?
| |
- | ** Ultimately need to organize yourselves
| |