Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0019
From PCSAR
< Critiques | 2010-08-24(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {{sug|19|EMS all terrain stretcher could not have gone in all way. It would have been a tough pack; Pincher SAR's would have been better.}}) |
m (Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug19 moved to Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0019) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{sug|19|EMS all terrain stretcher could not have gone in all way. It would have been a tough pack; Pincher SAR's would have been better.}} | + | {{sug|19|val=low|EMS all terrain stretcher could not have gone in all way. It would have been a tough pack; Pincher SAR's would have been better.}} |
| + | |||
| + | Re: Table Mtn. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The stretcher actually could have been taken all the way. | ||
| + | It's critical to get a backboard into situations like this. | ||
| + | May need to send a hasty team ahead of the stretcher. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reviewed at [[Members:Preplan/2010-11-16|2010-11-16 Preplan meeting]]. | ||
Current revision
Suggestion #19: EMS all terrain stretcher could not have gone in all way. It would have been a tough pack; Pincher SAR's would have been better.
- Committee handling: unassigned
- Value to PCSAR mandate: low
- Difficulty to implement: not rated
Re: Table Mtn.
The stretcher actually could have been taken all the way. It's critical to get a backboard into situations like this. May need to send a hasty team ahead of the stretcher.
Reviewed at 2010-11-16 Preplan meeting.
Facts about Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0019RDF feed
| Committee handling | Suggestion/Committee/List/unassigned + |
| Description | EMS all terrain stretcher could not have gone in all way. It would have been a tough pack; Pincher SAR's would have been better. + |
| Difficulty to implement | not rated + |
| Full page name | Critiques/2010-08-24/Sug/0019 + |
| Sequence number | 19 + |
| Suggestion list | Critiques/2010-08-24 + |
| Value to PCSAR mandate | low + |
