2012-10-02 Mock/Critque

From PCSAR

Jump to: navigation, search

This page is based on the Critique report template.

Use that template to make similar pages.

Suggestions coming from the 2012-10-02 critique regarding the mock of the same date.

Pincher Creek SAR routinely performs a critique after a Search and Rescue incident in order to learn what should be done differently or the same in the next similar incident. Critiques are not about criticism but rather about learning. They are normally chaired by a Search Manager that was not involved in the incident. The suggestions that are brought forward through the critique process are presented in this report.

Contents

[edit] Participants

[edit] Rough notes

#SuggestionReferred to
Sug1Didn't know notes were in C.P.training
Sug2Couldn't open the door. Need orientation.equipment
Sug3Move CP to LKPpreplan
Sug4time spent looking for stuff in CPequipment
Sug5weather limited ability to tracktraining
Sug6new CP worked well; radios good; cell phone goodequipment
Sug7Only team leaders should be in new command post; room is limited.preplan
Sug8It was not clear what operational activities should be simulated, e.g. medical/stretcher equipmenttraining
Sug9exercise should change size depending on number of teams availabletraining
Sug10Jeff (RCMP) willing to help with trainingtraining
Sug11Having Ops Section Chief at the CP table was good; close to the doorpreplan
Sug12teams should have internal communications (e.g. FRS) for search efficiencypreplan
Sug13Recommend first aid reviewtraining
Sug14Need instructions on how to operate generator.equipment
Sug15Need instructions on driving the MCPtraining
Sug16MCP needs CO detectorequipment
Sug17MCP needs curtain dividing sectionsequipment
Sug18Operations area of MCP needs file holder or accordion fileequipment
Sug19MCP needs clock by tableequipment
Sug20MCP needs better place to hang radio mic cord, or perhaps a longer cord, or bungie cordequipment
Sug21The MCP map table was good.equipment
Sug22MCP radio needs headsetequipment
Sug23There's a leak in the MCPequipment
Sug24The heat in the MCP works wellequipment
Sug25TL strategized by distance would have to travel to various assigned search localespreplan
Sug26Urban search should anticipate may have to search open buildings or buildings that have subsequently lockedpreplan
Sug27urban searching done by vehiclepreplan
Sug28use of dog in urban search; can handle large areatraining
Sug29the search segment was too large to be searchedtraining
Sug30need training on radio protocoltraining
Sug31Exercise felt disjointed; RCMP usually are involved earlier in incidenttraining
Sug32there should be a bigger turn out to training eventsboard
Sug33Teams in field should stick to assigned tasks, refer back to CP with changes.training
Sug34difficulty with only 2 teamspreplan
Sug35Need clarity when 2 teams come under one team leadertraining
Sug36technology always fails; e.g. radio, celltraining

[edit] Committee / Organization

The suggestions are being passed on to the indicated organizations/committees for their consideration. We recognize that not all suggestions may be appropriate, and some may already have been implemented.

PCSAR Board

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Overall ability of PCSAR to accomplish its mission.
  • Organizational policies
  • Relationships with Tasking Agencies and Fellow Responding Organizations.
  • Financing, budget

suggestions identified: 32

Tasking Agency

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Overall legal responsibility for incident.

Suggestions for the Tasking Agency are passed through the Board.

Fellow Responding Organizations

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Response to incident in accordance with their individual mandate and ability.

Suggestions for fellow responding organizations are passed through the Board.

PCSAR Preplan Committee

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Expertise in search and rescue.
  • Standard Operating Procedures for incidents.
  • Post incident critique, review and follow-up.

suggestions identified: 3, 7, 11, 12, 25, 26, 27, and 34

PCSAR Equipment Committee

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Obtaining and keeping equipment ready.

suggestions identified: 2, 4, 6, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24

PCSAR Call-Out Committee

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Respond to First Call from Tasking Agency
  • Contacting members during an incident.

suggestions identified: none

PCSAR Membership Committee

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Recruiting members.
  • Tracking members contact information, skills and equipment.

suggestions identified: none

PCSAR Training Committee

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Training members.

suggestions identified: 1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 35, and 36

PCSAR Technology Committee

Mandate Relevant to Incidents:

  • Technology support

suggestions identified: none


[edit] Suggestions by functional area

[edit] mandate

[edit] first notification / tasking

[edit] call-out

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug32:


Suggestion #32: there should be a bigger turn out to training events

Committee handling: board
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

[edit] investigation

[edit] communications

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug30:


Suggestion #30: need training on radio protocol

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug36:


Suggestion #36: technology always fails; e.g. radio, cell

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

[edit] resources

[edit] (de)briefing

[edit] searching

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug25:


Suggestion #25: TL strategized by distance would have to travel to various assigned search locales

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: done
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug27:


Suggestion #27: urban searching done by vehicle

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: medium
Difficulty to implement: easy

add to search guidelines to have one 2 person team in a vehicle doing roving patrols if warranted

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug28:


Suggestion #28: use of dog in urban search; can handle large area

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug29:


Suggestion #29: the search segment was too large to be searched

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

need to be more aware of segment sizes, difficulty etc.

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug35:


Suggestion #35: Need clarity when 2 teams come under one team leader

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

[edit] extrication

[edit] access/return from segment

[edit] stand down

[edit] CISM

[edit] prevention, public education

[edit] travel

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug3:


Suggestion #3: Move CP to LKP

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: done

[edit] planning

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug21:


Suggestion #21: The MCP map table was good.

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug26:


Suggestion #26: Urban search should anticipate may have to search open buildings or buildings that have subsequently locked

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: done

E.g. St. Mike's school was open

mention during training for urban search theory

[edit] logistics

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug2:


Suggestion #2: Couldn't open the door. Need orientation.

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug4:


Suggestion #4: time spent looking for stuff in CP

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

label appropriately, make a map of layout and contents then pass off to training for familiarty

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug6:


Suggestion #6: new CP worked well; radios good; cell phone good

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug14:


Suggestion #14: Need instructions on how to operate generator.

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug15:


Suggestion #15: Need instructions on driving the MCP

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug16:


Suggestion #16: MCP needs CO detector

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug17:


Suggestion #17: MCP needs curtain dividing sections

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug20:


Suggestion #20: MCP needs better place to hang radio mic cord, or perhaps a longer cord, or bungie cord

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug22:


Suggestion #22: MCP radio needs headset

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug23:


Suggestion #23: There's a leak in the MCP

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

Near the radio cabinet?

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug24:


Suggestion #24: The heat in the MCP works well

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

[edit] operations

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug7:


Suggestion #7: Only team leaders should be in new command post; room is limited.

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: none
Difficulty to implement: not rated

doesn't really apply, value to having all team members for briefing and debriefing.

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug11:


Suggestion #11: Having Ops Section Chief at the CP table was good; close to the door

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: done
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug12:


Suggestion #12: teams should have internal communications (e.g. FRS) for search efficiency

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: done

frs are usually deployed, must have been an oversight

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug18:


Suggestion #18: Operations area of MCP needs file holder or accordion file

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug19:


Suggestion #19: MCP needs clock by table

Committee handling: equipment
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug33:


Suggestion #33: Teams in field should stick to assigned tasks, refer back to CP with changes.

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated

CP is in charge. They decide what activity is next. E.g. returning to base. Radio in with suggested changes of activity.

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug34:


Suggestion #34: difficulty with only 2 teams

Committee handling: preplan
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: done

[edit] media

[edit] family

[edit] post ops

[edit] learning

2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug1:


Suggestion #1: Didn't know notes were in C.P.

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug5:


Suggestion #5: weather limited ability to track

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug8:


Suggestion #8: It was not clear what operational activities should be simulated, e.g. medical/stretcher equipment

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug9:


Suggestion #9: exercise should change size depending on number of teams available

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug10:


Suggestion #10: Jeff (RCMP) willing to help with training

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug13:


Suggestion #13: Recommend first aid review

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
2012-10-02 Mock/Critque/Sug31:


Suggestion #31: Exercise felt disjointed; RCMP usually are involved earlier in incident

Committee handling: training
Value to PCSAR mandate: not rated
Difficulty to implement: not rated
=== misc ===
Facts about 2012-10-02 Mock/CritqueRDF feed
Committee handling Suggestion/Committee/List/board  +, Suggestion/Committee/List/training  +, Suggestion/Committee/List/preplan  +, and Suggestion/Committee/List/equipment  +
Description there should be a bigger turn out to training events  +, need training on radio protocol  +, technology always fails; e.g. radio, cell  +, TL strategized by distance would have to travel to various assigned search locales  +, urban searching done by vehicle  +, use of dog in urban search; can handle large area  +, the search segment was too large to be searched  +, Need clarity when 2 teams come under one team leader  +, Move CP to LKP  +, The MCP map table was good.  +, Urban search should anticipate may have to search open buildings or buildings that have subsequently locked  +, Couldn't open the door. Need orientation.  +, time spent looking for stuff in CP  +, new CP worked well; radios good; cell phone good  +, Need instructions on how to operate generator.  +, Need instructions on driving the MCP  +, MCP needs CO detector  +, MCP needs curtain dividing sections  +, MCP needs better place to hang radio mic cord, or perhaps a longer cord, or bungie cord  +, MCP radio needs headset  +, There's a leak in the MCP  +, The heat in the MCP works well  +, Only team leaders should be in new command post; room is limited.  +, Having Ops Section Chief at the CP table was good; close to the door  +, teams should have internal communications (e.g. FRS) for search efficiency  +, Operations area of MCP needs file holder or accordion file  +, MCP needs clock by table  +, Teams in field should stick to assigned tasks, refer back to CP with changes.  +, difficulty with only 2 teams  +, Didn't know notes were in C.P.  +, weather limited ability to track  +, It was not clear what operational activities should be simulated, e.g. medical/stretcher equipment  +, exercise should change size depending on number of teams available  +, Jeff (RCMP) willing to help with training  +, Recommend first aid review  +, and Exercise felt disjointed; RCMP usually are involved earlier in incident  +
Difficulty to implement not rated  +, done  +, and easy  +
Full page name 2012-10-02 Mock/Critque  +
Sequence number 32  +, 30  +, 36  +, 25  +, 27  +, 28  +, 29  +, 35  +, 3  +, 21  +, 26  +, 2  +, 4  +, 6  +, 14  +, 15  +, 16  +, 17  +, 20  +, 22  +, 23  +, 24  +, 7  +, 11  +, 12  +, 18  +, 19  +, 33  +, 34  +, 1  +, 5  +, 8  +, 9  +, 10  +, 13  +, and 31  +
Value to PCSAR mandate not rated  +, medium  +, and none  +
Personal tools